| |
Wanted: A Viable Biofuel Crop to Grow
in Semi-arid Arizona
by Joe Gelt
Dazzled by the gold-rush mentality promising U.S. farmers wealth by
growing corn for ethanol production, an article in the Mar. 26 edition
of Inside Tucson Business began, “Amber fields of corn growing,
as far as the eye can see ... in Southern Arizona? It’s possible,
say industry and agricultural research specialists, and it could happen
sooner than anyone expects.”
It is indeed a fetching image. Whatever role Arizona may play in the promising
field of biofuel production, however, corn is not likely to be the crop
to enable farmers and others in the state to cash in on the developing
biofuel market. Water and climate, especially water, limits what grows
and thrives in the state. Despite alluring possibilities, Arizona is not
a big corn-growing state.
What then is the biofuel future of the state? What can be grown in semi-arid
Arizona for use in biofuel production?
Researchers at the University of Arizona are considering various crops
for bioenergy production that could be grown in Arizona. Don Slack, department
head, agricultural and biosystems engineering, says an ethanol group was
formed and “We started looking and thinking about crops we might
grow. ... We narrowed it rather quickly on sorghum, then we narrowed it
further to sweet sorghum as opposed to grain or milo sorghum.”
Slack says “Sorghum loves heat and loves drought and so is a perfect
crop for Arizona.” Water quality is less of a problem when growing
sorghum. Since sorghum is grown as an industrial plant and not a food
crop, effluent can be used for irrigation. Further sorghum is salt-tolerant,
able to use marginal waters. Slack says, “It is the kind of crop
you can grow in an arid climate where you have water of poor quality.”
An acre of sweet sorghum grown this summer at a UA agricultural facility
is about ready to be harvested. Slack says, “We are intending to
harvest the sweet sorghum and produce the juice from the canes. Pinal
Energy will run a batch through its fermentation and distillation process
to get an idea of the yield of ethanol per gallon of juice and the ultimately
gallons of ethanol per acre.”
Stalks of sweet sorghum contain fermentable sugars in the sap equal to
400-600 gallons of ethanol per acre. This is about twice that from corn
grain.
Sorghum holds promise for Indian farmers who have rights to a fairly significant
amount of CAP water. The San Carlos Apaches and the Yaqui tribes have
expressed interest in growing sorghum.
Slack thinks sorghum may interest Arizona cotton growers. He says, “If
the US is going to get beat up by the World Trade Organization on cotton
subsidies, farmers will be looking for an alternative to cotton. Sorghum
might be a good alternative.”
Some work remains to be done before sorghum becomes a viable Arizona crop.
Slack says, “There is no question that we can grow it and it grows
like crazy here. Getting it harvested and the juice fermented are the
two big things now. If we can get a food or animal fodder out of it would
be another plus. It would have the same appeal as corn.
“I’d say we are a couple of years out before we are producing
much of this.”
The algae option
Arizona’s biofuel future then may not be amber fields of corn as
far as the eye can see but sorghum fields stretched off into the distance.
Another possibility, although not presenting a very picturesque image,
is single-celled pond scum called algae covering pools and ponds. This
may be a new bio-farming industry for Arizona, with commercial-scale microalgae
production an up-and-coming crop for Arizona farmers.
Algae has been getting very good press lately as the most promising, environmentally-friendly
way to produce biofuel, the rising star in the biofuel constellation.
Only requiring sunlight, water and carbon dioxide to grow, the single-celled
organism can quadruple in biomass in just one day. Depending upon the
species, algae can produce oil for use as a biodiesel, starch that can
be converted to ethanol by fermentation and hydrogen gas. UA researcher
Joel Cuello’s main research interest is using algae to produce oil
— biodiesel as well jet fuel.
Cuello, from the agricultural and biosystems engineering department, says
the desert is very well suited for growing algae. The desert’s abundant
wastelands or marginally arable lands can be fertile fields to grow algae.
This means that hitherto unproductive lands can be put into production.
Growing algae does not raise the prickly issue of using land that could
be cultivated to grow crops, as does growing corn.
Algae provides bigger payoff than higher crops. Whereas an acre of corn
produces about 300 gallons of ethanol annually, an acre of soybeans about
60 gallons of biodiesel, an acre of algae could produce more than 5,000
gallons of biofuel each year.
Growing algae does not require abundant, high quality water. Water not
suited for other uses without additional treatment, such as domestic uses
or conventional agriculture, is suitable for algae growth. Secondary treated
wastewater, rich in hydrogen and phosphorus nutrients, is excellent for
growing algae. Irrigation runoff and dairy wastewater can be used. Also
of special interest to Arizona some algae can thrive on non-potable saline
and brackish waters.
Also, water savings are significant when growing algae. Cuello says, “If
you are growing higher plants like corn or even sorghum you have to water
them regularly. Not only is water consumption lower with algae, but there
is less of a problem with evaporation.” Further water saving result
since water not taken up by the algae cells is recycled. Cuello notes
another advantage to growing algae in Arizona. “We have a lot of
sunlight here as opposed to, say the Northeast. Algae is a photosynthesizing
orgasm so sunlight ultimately is their source of energy.”
Along with research conducted at the UA, researchers at Arizona State
University also are focused on algae, with work being done to develop
industrial bioreactors to mass culture microalgae for biofuel production.
Cuello says, “There are lots of different types of algae –
myriads, thousands, millions. It is the matter of identifying the ones
that are going to be the most productive for biofuels.” He added,
“And most likely that is going to be propriety information for companies.”
How soon will production plants be up and operating in Arizona to convert
algae into biofuels? Cuello says, “I would say it is within striking
distance. It is very close.”
Cellulosic ethanol
Another option to consider is cellulosic ethanol, a biofuel made from
plants or plant waste. Cellulosic ethanol can be produced from agricultural
waste, sugar cane residue, timbering slash, wood chips and prairie grasses
such as buffalo grass and switchgrass. Some analysts contend that if ethanol
is ever to replace gasoline it will have to be produced from these abundant
sources. Corn is not going to do the job; it is expected to meet only
10 percent of the U.S. transportation needs.
A recent USDA report on cellulosic ethanol acknowledges that cellulosic
fuel holds “some longer-term promise,” but maintains that
“much research is needed to make it commercially economical.”
Therein lies the challenge, to develop an efficient and economic way to
produce ethanol from cellulosic materials.
Research on growing switchgrass in Arizona for a cellulosic biofuel is
just getting started. UA researcher Mike Ottman of the plant sciences
department will be working on a research project next year to study six
different types of perennial grasses including switchgrass at different
level of evaptransporation. The same research will be replicated at Washington
State University, with USDA funding both projects.
Ottman says, “ What we are trying to do is look at the water requirements
for perennial grasses in the western United States. ... Washington and
Arizona. We are covering a range of possible environments.”
The intent of the research is to determine whether switchgrass and other
types of grasses are viable as a biofuel with regards to water use in
the West.
Ottman says it remains to be seen whether cellulosic ethanol production
will be a viable option for Arizona agriculture. He says, “I imagine
we can get pretty good yield because of our sunshine and warm weather
conditions; our disadvantages is our production cost . ... A big part
of the production cost with irrigated agriculture is the water.”
Ottman sees agriforestry possibilities in the state, with fast growing
trees such as the poplar planted for use in ethanol production.
In fact, U.S. forests are being seen lately as the good source of wood
for ethanol. Forest Service Chief Abigail Kimbell recently proposed replacing
15 percent of the nation’s gasoline with ethanol made from wood
from forests. She said much of this material would be small-diameter trees
and underbrush, with most of it obtained during forest thinning efforts
to remove underbrush to prevent wildfires.
An Arizona official mentioned that forest thinning for bioenergy could
result in a water advantage to the state. Along with providing wood for
ethanol, the thinning of forested areas would increase the amount of water
flowing from watersheds, thus adding to available water supplies.
Global Water Sponsors Supplement
This edition of the AWR contains a 4-page supplement from Global Water
titled Total Water Management: Resource Conservation in the Face of Population
Growth and Water Scarcity. By sponsoring the supplement, Global Water
is supporting the publication of this newsletter. We appreciate the opportunity
to work with Global Water and the utility’s generous support.

|
|