|
Dr.
Merle
H. Jensen
Controlled Environment Agricultural Center
Department of Plant Science
University of Arizona
Tucson, AZ 85721
introduction
historical review
cea
site selection
energy and water
structures and environmental
control
hydroponic/soilless culture
pest control
overview
cited literature
INTRODUCTION
(top)
Hydroponics
is a technology for growing plants in nutrient solutions (water
containing fertilizers) with or without the use of an artificial
medium (sand, gravel, vermiculite, rockwool, perlite, peatmoss.
coir, or sawdust)
to provide mechanical support. Liquid hydroponic systems have no
other supporting medium for the plant roots: aggregate systems have
a solid medium of support. Hydroponic systems are further categorized
as open (i.e., once the nutrient solution is delivered to the plant
roots, it is not reused) or closed (i.e., surplus solution is recovered,
replenished, and recycled).
In
combination with greenhouses, it is high technology and capital-intensive.
It is also highly productive, conservative of water and land, and
protective of the environment. Yet for most of its employees, hydroponic
culture requires only basic agriculture skills. Since regulating
the aerial and root environment is a major concern in such agricultural
systems, production takes place inside enclosures designed to control
air and root temperatures, light, water, plant nutrition, and adverse
climate.
There
are many types of controlled environment/hydroponic systems. Each
component of controlled-environment agriculture (CEA) is of equal
importance, whether it be the structural design, the environmental
control, or the growing system. Not every system is cost-effective
in every location. All too often, importance is given to only one
or two of the key components, but the system fails due to lack of
attention to any one of the components. If improper attention is
given to the greenhouse structure and its environment, no hydroponic
system will prove economically viable. While hydroponic and CEA
are not synonymous, CEA usually accompanies hydroponics. Their potentials
and problems are inextricable.
HISTORICAL REVIEW (top)
The
development of hydroponics has not been rapid. Although the first
use of CEA was the growing of off-season cucumbers under "transparent
stone" (mica) for the Roman Emperor Tiberius during the 1st
century, the technology is believed to have been used little, if
at all, for the following 1500 years.
Greenhouses
(and experimental hydroponics) appeared in France and England during
the 17th century; Woodward grew mint plants without soil in England
in the year 1699. The basic laboratory techniques of nutrient solution
culture were developed (independently) by Sachs and Knap in Germany
about 1860 (Hoagland and Arnon, 1938).
In
the United States, interest began to develop in the possible use
of complete nutrient solutions for large-scale crop production about
1925. Greenhouse soils had to be replaced at frequent intervals
or else be maintained in good condition from year to year by adding
large quantities of commercial fertilizers. As a result of these
difficulties, research workers in certain U.S. agricultural experiment
stations turned to nutrient solution culture methods as a means
of replacing the natural soil system with either an aerated nutrient
solution or an artificial soil composed of chemically inert aggregates
moistened with nutrient solutions (Withrow and Withrow, 1948).
Between
1925 and 1935, extensive development took place in modifying the
methods of the plant physiologists to large-scale crop production.
Workers at the New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station improved
the sand culture method (Shive and Robbins, 1937). The water and
sand culture methods were used for large-scale production by investigators
at the California Agricultural Experiment Station (Hoagland and
Arnon, 1938). Each of these two methods involved certain fundamental
limitations for commercial crop production, which partially were
overcome with the introduction of the subirrigation system initiated
in 1934 at the New Jersey and Indiana Agricultural Experiment Stations
(Withrow and Withrow, 1948). Gericke (1940) published a description
of a quasi-commercial use of the liquid technique and apparently
coined the word hydroponics in passing. The technology was used
in a few limited applications on Pacific islands during World War
II. After the war, Purdue Univ. popularized hydroponics (called
nutriculture) in a classic series of extension service bulletins
(Withrow and Withrow, 1948) describing the precise delivery of nutrient
solution to plant roots in either liquid or aggregate systems. While
there was commercial interest in the use of such systems, hydroponics
or nutriculture was not widely accepted because of the high cost
in construction of the concrete growing beds.
After
a period of ~20 years, interest in hydroponics was renewed with
the advent of plastics. Plastics were used not only in the glazing
of greenhouses, but also in place of concrete in lining the growing
beds. Plastics were also important in the introduction of drip irrigation.
Numerous promotional schemes involving hydroponics became common
with huge investments made in growing systems.
Greenhouse
areas began to expand significantly in Europe and Asia during the
1950s and 1960s, and large hydroponic systems were developed in
the deserts of California, Arizona, Abu Dhabi, and Iran about 1970
(Fontes, 1973; Jensen and Teran, 1971). In these desert locations,
the advantages of the technology were augmented by the duration
and interest of the solar radiation, which maximized photosynthetic
production.
Unfortunately,
escalating oil prices, starting in 1973, substantially increased
the costs of CEA heating and cooling by one or two orders of magnitude.
This, along with fewer chemicals registered for pest control, caused
many bankruptcies and a decreasing interest in hydroponics, especially
in the United States.
Since
the inception of hydroponics, research to refine the methodology
has continued. In the late 1960s researchers at the Glasshouse Crops
Research Institute (GCRI), Littlehampton, England developed the
nutrient film technique along with a number of subsequent refinements
(Graves, 1983). This research gave rise to the hydroponic systems
used today. Jensen and Collins (1985) published a complete review
of hydroponics highlighting many new cultural systems developed
in Europe and the United States.
Almost
20 years have passed since the last real commercial interest in
hydroponics, but today there is renewed interest among growers establishing
CEA/hydroponic systems. This is especially true in regions where
there is concern about controlling pollution of ground water with
nutrient wastes or soil sterilants. Today growers appear to be much
more critical in regard to site selection, structures, the growing
system, pest control, and markets.
CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENT AGRICULTURE (top)
Site
Selection (top)
Prior
to 1970, the greenhouse vegetable industry was located near the
high-population centers, mainly in the states of Ohio, Michigan,
and Massachusetts. In 1867, a committee of the Massachusetts Horticultural
Society noted the rapid growth of vegetables under glass and suggested
that prizes be offered to encourage the practice (Massachusetts
Horticultural Society, 1880). All commercial production was in soil.
In
1965, Ohio was the major greenhouse vegetable region in the United
States, with more than 240 ha. After 1970, with the rapid rise in
energy cost to heat greenhouses, along with the construction of
superhighways to transport fresh produce from southern regions,
Ohio became an importer of tomatoes. Today, the greenhouse vegetable
industry in these eastern states has collapsed and is insignificant.
With
the superhighways in America, the energy required to transport fresh
vegetables from the southern region of the United States and from
Mexico is less than that required to heat a greenhouse. For example,
in conventional greenhouses in Ohio, nearly 40,000 kcal of energy
are required to grow 1 kg of tomatoes vs. only 4000 kcal in the
open field. Shipping 1 kg of tomatoes 5000 km north by semi-truck
expends only 1865 kcal of energy.
Today
with superhighways and high energy costs, light is considered the
most important factor for greenhouse vegetable production, rather
than locating close to a population center. In the United States,
the highest light levels are in the southwestern desert regions
of the country. This is especially important to know if a grower
is to grow greenhouse vegetables during the winter, when tomato
and cucumber prices are at their
Table
I. Solar photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) by location in
the United States.
|
|
PAR
(mol-m-2)
|
|
Location
|
December
|
June
|
October-March
|
|
Tucson,
AZ
|
23
|
63
|
195
|
|
Miami,
FL
|
25
|
44
|
187
|
|
San
Diego, CA
|
21
|
48
|
172
|
|
Denver,
CO
|
17
|
58
|
153
|
|
Philadelphia,
PA
|
10
|
46
|
100
|
|
Cleveland,
OH
|
8
|
48
|
92
|
|
New
York, NY
|
6
|
44
|
78
|
highest
(Table 1). Generally, a 1% decrease in light reduces yield 1%. A
greenhouse in a high light region can produce more than 500 t of
winter tomatoes per ha per year. Producing such yields in northern
latitudes is only possible if the crops are grown through the summer
period, when market prices are at their lowest.
Along
with the light factor are temperature considerations, especially
in the southwest desert. For example, if tomatoes are selected as
the crop to be grown year-round, low elevations must be avoided,
due to the difficulty in maintaining desirable temperatures in the
greenhouse during late spring and early fall, even with fan and
pad cooling. In the late 1960s, hydroponic installations were installed
in low-elevation regions in Texas and Arizona. In most regions of
Texas, evaporative cooling is ineffective due to high ambient humidity.
Escalating energy costs in the 1970s added to the costs of cooling
in the summer, as well as heating during the winter months. This,
coupled with insect and disease problems and high amortization costs,
especially when growers were purchasing turnkey greenhouse systems
rather than building their own growing system, caused most hydroponic
installations to fail financially. This was true not only in Texas
and Arizona, but throughout the United States.
Given
the high cost of fan and pad equipment, future hydroponic growers
will be selecting sites at specific elevations that have summer
temperatures that do not require evaporative cooling, therefore
sparing the costs of such cooling equipment. At the same time, an
elevation should be selected that is not too high in order to avoid
high heating costs in winter. In southern Arizona, such an elevation
for tomato production would range from 1250 to 1675 m and for cucumber
production, 600 to 1250 m.
Proposed
as an alternative to fan and pad cooling is high-pressure fog systems.
Recent experiences have proven this method of cooling desirable
if the feed water is absolutely free of any undissolved or dissolved
solids. It is important for the greenhouse structure to have ridge
vents to accommodate ample air exchange for prescribed temperature
and humidity control. Any time a grower deviates from the prescribed
growing temperatures for a given crop, yields will be lowered. The
more a grower has to cool or heat a greenhouse in order to maintain
recommended temperatures, the greater the cost to operate the facility,
therefore lessening financial return. If evaporative cooling systems
are used, locating the greenhouse in a region of low outdoor humidity
is important.
Especially
important is selection of a site free of insects that might be vectors
for severe virus diseases. Early hydroponic ventures did not consider
this. In the United States and Mexico, sites were selected where
white flies existed. These can be a vector of gemini viruses, which
are extremely lethal to most solanaceous and cucurbit crops. Screens
on air intakes do not always work, as the white fly almost always
gains entry into the growing area. Growing in regions where there
are mild winters normally increases the incidence of insects and
diseases due to the continued life cycle of the pest. Selecting
a site that isn't already a major producer of vegetable crops is
also advisable.
Energy
and Water (top)
There
are many choices of energy sources, such as natural gas, propane,
fuel oil and electricity. Many early hydroponic growers did not
consider cost differences between the types of energy. Many used
natural gas and fuel oil. Coal was once used but air pollution standards
and regulations make the use of this fuel prohibitively expensive.
There
is new interest today in lighting greenhouses with high intensity-discharge
lamps. Both the capital and operating cost of such systems are extremely
high and will not, in the foreseeable future, permit competition
with winter greenhouse vegetables grown in highlight regions. An
exception may be in Quebec, Canada, where the electrical rates are
extremely low.
Water
quality has become a major concern of greenhouse growers, especially
where large amounts of water are applied to a restricted volume
of growing medium. Plant growth is affected by the interaction of
the dissolved chemical elements in the water supply, the chemical
properties of the growing medium to which the water is applied,
and the fertility program employed.
In
selecting a greenhouse site, a grower must be aware of several chemical
properties that might cause problems for greenhouse growers: pH,
alkalinity, soluble salts, calcium, magnesium, boron, fluoride,
chloride, sulfates, sodium, carbonate, and iron. The cleaner the
water, the greater the opportunity to achieve maximum yields. The
water designated for use in a greenhouse must be analyzed for agricultural
suitability during greenhouse site selection.
Structures
and Environmental Control (top)
The
European glass structures that today are commonly being built for
vegetable production in the southwestern part of the United States
are very different from the polyethylene/fiberglass houses used
in hydroponic production between 1965 and 1990. The European structures
are much higher.
To
achieve a more uniform growing environment, without rapid temperature
fluctuations, more total volume of space is being allotted within
a greenhouse; today the gutters of greenhouse structures are commonly
more than 5 m above ground level.
The
types of polyethylene sheet films are much the same except those
introduced over a decade ago that retard the loss of infrared heat
These films are reported to reduce 20% of the heat loss from a greenhouse
and have become common in today's industry, especially in Europe.
Other glazing materials, such as fiberglass, polyvinyl chloride,
Mylar and Tedlar, have proven either less appropriate, inconvenient,
or in most cases, much more expensive than polyethylene, even though
the latter may have to be replaced more frequently. Newer materials,
such as polycarbonates and acrylics have become much more common,
but their popularity has been offset by high costs.
Greenhouses
are expensive, however, and controlling the environment within a
greenhouse requires considerable energy. Starting 20 years ago,
there was major research emphasis on the use of solar energy and
reject heat from large industrial units. Although solar energy as
a greenhouse heat source is technically feasible, it has not proven
economical because of collection and storage costs. The economics
of using waste heat from generating plants favors incorporating
the heat-use system into the overall plans for new plants, rather
than modifying existing ones.
In
the last 10 years, there has been interest in the development of
cogeneration plants; small electrical plants receive government
assistance if designed to use the waste heat from the electrical
generators. Several such facilities have been established that use
the waste heat either to heat greenhouse vegetables or water for
fish production. While such opportunities are inviting, excess government
regulation and red tape have discouraged many investors from taking
advantage of such opportunities.
Whatever
the source of energy, it should be conserved once it is in the greenhouse.
In regions of cold winter weather, thermal curtains of porous polyester
or an aluminum foil fabric are installed to reduce night heat loss
by as much as 57%. In the deserts of the southwest, winter temperatures
are not severe enough to warrant curtains. While curtains will provide
energy savings, they are not sufficiently effective to warrant their
high cost. Furthermore, the shade from the curtains, even when rolled
up and stored during the day, can reduce yields.
Computers
can operate hundreds of devices within a greenhouse (vents, heaters,
fans, hot water mixing valves, irrigation valves, curtains. lights.
etc.) by utilizing dozens of input parameters, such as outside and
inside temperatures, humidity, outside wind direction and velocity,
carbon dioxide levels and even the time of day or night. Unlike
early control systems, computers are used today to collect and log
data provided by greenhouse production managers. A computer can
keep track of all relevant information. such as temperature, humidity,
C02, and light levels. It dates and time tags the information and
stores it for current or later use. Such a data acquisition system
enables the grower to gain a comprehensive understanding of all
factors affecting the quality and timeliness of the product.
Hydroponic/Soilless
Culture (top)
While
there are many types of growing systems, the two most popular growing
media today are rockwool and perlite. Due to the high cost of rockwool,
root volume is being reduced. Growers in Arizona are growing six
tomato plants from a rockwool slab no bigger than 7.5 x 130 x 15
cm. Each plant has a root volume no greater than 2438 cm3. (A gallon
contains 3608 cm3.) The irrigation system may be activated more
than 30 times per day. At the University of Arizona, excellent tomato
crops have been grown in a container no larger than 956 cm3. In
this case, the irrigation system was left on continuously to optimize
root aeration, pH, and nutrition. Maximum yields were 12.8 kg of
tomatoes per plant over a 6-month period.
In
the future, growers will provide little root volume in order not
only to reduce media cost but to maximize control over mineral nutrition,
pH, aeration and root diseases. Unbelievably high salt levels are
maintained in the root systems where the E.C. of the feed solution
will approach 3.5 and the drain water at an E.C. of 4.5 to 5.0.
This helps to control plant growth as well as flavor of the tomato
fruit. All systems in the future will be closed, with no drainage,
preventing any loss of mineral elements and the contamination of
groundwater. For health reasons, hydroponic systems may be used
to reduce nitrogen levels in leafy vegetables at harvest. This is
especially true in Europe for such crops grown under low winter
light intensities.
Pest
Control (top)
Early
hydroponic operations were devastated by pest problems. White flies,
leaf miners, pin worms, nematodes, Cladosporium leaf mold and viruses,
as well as root diseases such as Pythium root rot and bacterial
wilt, were common. Today, unlike 20 years ago, the drain solution
is often sterilized (Runia, 1995). The options are heat treatment,
ozone and ultraviolet radiation. The University of Arizona has a
program to control certain root diseases with surfactants or by
using nonchemical approaches. While the results are not yet practiced
in hydroponic systems, the results look promising.
Today
integrated pest management (IPM) is of particular interest to Americans
in CEA because of the paucity of pesticides with legal clearance
for use in greenhouses. The frightening ability of some pests to
develop resistance to chemical pesticides has revived worldwide
interest in the use of natural enemies of insect pests, particularly
when used in association with horticultural practices, genetics
and other control mechanisms. Tomorrow's growers may be growing
crops without applying any chemicals to control diseases and insects.
Crop production requires both the identification of possible crop
disease and insect problems, and the ability to properly integrate
disease and insect prevention and control practices into a total
management plan.
OVERVIEW (top)
Hydroponic
culture is an inherently attractive, often oversimplified technology,
which is far easier to promote than to sustain. Unfortunately, failures
far outnumber the successes, due to management inexperience or lack
of scientific and engineering support. Thus, interest in hydroponics
has followed a roller coaster ride since its conception. However,
in recent years, extensive research and development programs in
Europe have vastly improved hydroponic production systems. These
new technologies are today being successfully transferred to the
United States, proving hydroponics a technical reality in the high
light regions of the desert southwest.
Each
crop is very specific in its environmental requirements. To deviate
at all will decrease both the desired yield and quality of a product
Added to this, seed or propagation material must possess the genetic
characters suited to the environment in which it is grown. Most
growing systems will work well horticulturally, but systems can
differ considerably in cost. Regardless of the type of system, greenhouse
agriculture can be extremely expensive. There is no room for mistakes.
The cost of CEA may be more than compensated by the significantly
higher productivity of greenhouse agriculture as compared to open
field agriculture.
The
technology of hydroponic systems is changing rapidly with systems
today producing yields never before realized. In the last four years,
nearly 40 ha of greenhouses have been built in Colorado, Nevada,
and Arizona. Many more hectares are planned, not only in the Southwest,
but in Mexico. The future for hydroponics appears more positive
today than any time over the last 50 years. I sincerely believe
hydroponics will be fashionable again!
CITED LITERATURE (top)
Fontes,
M.R. 1973. Controlled-environment horticulture in the Arabian Desert
at Abu Dhabi. HortScience 8:13-16.
Gericke,
W.F. 1940. The complete guide to soilless gardening. Prentice-Hall.
Englewood Cliffs. N.J.
Graves,
C.G. The nutrient film technique. Hort. Rev. 5: l-44.
Hoagland,
D.R. and D.l. Arnon. 1938. The water culture method for growing
plants without soil. California Agr. Expt. Sta. Circ. 347.
Jensen,
M.H. and W.L. Collins. 1985. Hydroponic vegetable production. Hort.
Rev. 7:483-558.
Jensen,
M.H. and M.A. Teran. 1971. Use of controlled environment for vegetable
production in desert regions of the world. Hortscience 6:33-36.
Manning,
R. (ed). 1880. History of the Massachusetts Horticultural Society
l829-l878. Mass. Hort. Soc., Boston.
Runia,
W.T. 1995. A review of possibilities for disinfection of recirculation
water from soilless cultures. Glasshouse Crops Res. Sta., Naaldwijk,
Holland. p.9.
Shive,
J.W. and W.R. Robbins. 1937. Methods of growing plants in solution
and sand cultures. New Jersey Agr. Expt. Sta. Bul. 636.
Withrow,
R.B. and A.P. Withrow. 1948. Nutriculture. S.C. 328. Purdue Univ.
Agr. Expt Sta. W. Lafayette, Md.
HORTSCIENCE,
VOL.32(6), October, 1997
ceac
: research : archive
: Hydroponics: an overview
|