Improving Management and Control of Fungal Diseases Affecting Arizona Citrus Trees, 1997

Michael Matheron, Associate Research Scientist, Plant Pathology, Yuma Agricultural Center
Michael Maurer, Assistant Agent, Agriculture, Maricopa County
Martin Porchas, Research Technician, Yuma Agricultural Center

Abstract

Studies were conducted to evaluate potential chemical disease management tools for Alternaria fruit rot on navel oranges and Coniophora brown wood rot on lemon trees, investigate the possible effect of branch diameter on development of Coniophora wood rot on lemon trees and summarize our evaluations of citrus rootstocks with respect to relative resistance to root rot and stem canker development when challenged with Phytophthora citrophthora and P. parasitica. We were unable to reduce the level of Alternaria fruit rot on navel oranges with single applications of Abound or copper hydroxide following significant rainfall events. Wood decay in lemon branches inoculated with Coniophora eremophila was significantly suppressed by Abound and a thick formulation of sodium tetrathiocarbonate. The degree of Coniophora brown wood rot in lemon branches of different diameters was variable, although the level of disease in 10 mm diameter branches was significantly smaller than the amount of wood decay in 30 mm diameter branches. Root loss due to Phytophthora citrophthora and P. parasitica in Citrus macrophylla, rough lemon, C. volkameriana and Troyer citrange was lower than most of the 36 different rootstocks tested. On the other hand, root loss on Carrizo citrange, C-35 citrange and sour orange was among the higher values of disease recorded. Stem canker development due to both species of Phytophthora on Troyer citrange, Carrizo citrange, sour orange and Citrus macrophylla was lower than most of the 36 rootstocks tested. Stem cankers on rough lemon and Citrus volkameriana were among the higher values of disease recorded.

Introduction

Pathogenic fungi are responsible for several diseases in Arizona citrus groves. One of these diseases, Alternaria fruit rot caused by the fungus Alternaria citri, is commonly found in many navel orange groves in Maricopa County. Annual fruit losses have been estimated to reach 0.5 box per tree. Consistent reduction of Alternaria fruit rot by timely application of fungicides has yet to be achieved. Additional study is needed to develop a reliable disease management approach.

Coniophora brown wood rot has caused extensive destruction in mature lemon plantings in Yuma County. A considerable amount of knowledge has been gained concerning the biology of the pathogen, Coniophora eremophila. We know that this fungus grows best at temperatures that occur during the summer in Arizona. All major types of citrus can be attacked by this pathogen; however, disease development is most severe on lemon. There does not appear to be a significant effect of rootstock on disease development in lemon trees. Natural infection is associated with wounds on lemon trees, including stress fractures where branches are cracked but not completely severed from the tree. With respect to potential chemical tools for disease management, a product called Nectec P and its component active ingredients, propiconazole and imazalil, significantly reduce the amount of wood decay in treated branches.

Many important questions remain to be answered concerning Coniophora brown wood rot. Observational evidence suggests that young lemon wood might be less susceptible than older wood. Also, additional chemical disease management tools may be available. Further research is needed to address these additional questions.

Many disease management tools are available to combat diseases caused by Phytophthora. These include cultural methods such as avoiding over-irrigation, chemical methods involving the application of fungicides such as Ridomil or Aliette, and the use of genetic disease resistance when available. The relative resistance or tolerance of commonly used citrus rootstocks has been documented in earlier research studies. Unfortunately, these studies usually relate to tolerance or resistance to only one of the two species of Phytophthora that infect citrus in Arizona or only to root rot or only to gummosis. We have developed methods to test 4 to 12 month old citrus rootstock plants under standardized environmental conditions to determine their relative resistance to root rot or gummosis caused by Phytophthora citrophthora or P. parasitica. These testing methods can be used to compare disease resistance or tolerance of rootstocks currently used as well as potential new citrus rootstocks.

The specific research objectives of these investigations were (1) to continue to test possible chemical disease management approaches for Alternaria fruit rot, (2) to study the effect of wood age as well as fungicides on the rate of Coniophora brown wood rot development, and (3) to continue to test potential new citrus rootstocks for resistance or tolerance to Phytophthora root rot and gummosis.

Materials and Methods

Alternaria fruit rot

A field trial was established in a navel orange grove with a history of Alternaria fruit rot. In a randomized complete block experimental design, treatments consisted of application of Abound (at a rate of 0.2 lb. active ingredient per acre) or Procop (copper hydroxide at a rate of 7.7 lb. active ingredient per acre). Ten replicate trees were treated once with one of these compounds either on 2 July, 5 August or 25 August with two gallons of spray mixture being applied to each tree. The applications on 5 and 25 August were made after significant rainfall events. Ten nontreated trees served as controls. The number of fruit dropping from test trees in this study was recorded from 10 September to 10 November, 1997.

Coniophora brown wood rot

To study the effect of wood age on disease development, branches of various ages (10 , 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, and 70 mm in diameter) on mature lemon trees were inoculated with the fungus by inserting small segments of wood dowels colonized by the pathogen into holes drilled into branches. After 6 months, the inoculated sections of branches were removed from test trees, split open and the length of resulting decay column was recorded. In another experiment, segments of wood dowels colonized by Coniophora were treated with various fungicides or wound dressings before inserting into citrus branches. After 6 months, branches were examined and the length of resulting decay column was used to rate the relative ability of each tested material to suppress development of Coniophora brown wood rot relative to the absence of any treatment at all.

Phytophthora root rot and gummosis

In earlier preliminary screening trials, five replicate seedlings of each test rootstock were challenged with either Phytophthora citrophthora or P. parasitica in the root rot and gummosis studies. Additional trials were conducted on available rootstock material for more extensive evaluation of relative resistance to root rot and gummosis. For the root rot studies, roots of citrus plants were immersed in water containing zoospores of P. citrophthora or P. parasitica for 48 hr. at 24oC, then planted individually in 4-inch-diameter pots and grown in the greenhouse for approximately 4 months. At the end of each trial, the root weight of inoculated plants compared to noninoculated plants was calculated for each rootstock to determine the percent root loss due to each species of Phytophthora. To evaluate rootstocks for relative resistance to stem lesion development (gummosis), plants were stem-inoculated with each pathogen, incubated at 21oC for 12 days in a growth chamber, then the length of stem cankers was measured. Data summarized in this report include experiments conducted from 1993 to 1996, in which rootstocks ranged from 5 to 11 months old for the root rot tests and 4 to 27 months old for stem inoculation trials.

Results and Discussion

Alternaria fruit rot

There was no significant difference in the amount of navel orange fruit drop recorded on trees treated with Abound or Procop in 1997 compared to nontreated trees (Table 1). Apparently, a single application of either compound after a significant rainfall had no effect on the resultant level of disease. Considering these results as well as those presented in earlier reports, we have not been able to develop a reliable disease management approach for Alternaria fruit rot. Further studies concentrating on the biology of disease development could give us the information needed to formulate a working disease management plan.

Coniophora brown wood rot

The amount of wood decay recorded on 10-mm-diameter lemon wood branches in 1997 was significantly smaller than that on 30-mm-diameter branches; results similar to those observed in the 1996 trial (Table 2). On the other hand, the degree of wood decay on branches 10 mm in diameter was not significantly different than decay that occurred on branches 20, 40, 50, 60 and 70 mm in diameter. At this point, the combined data for 1996 and 1997 suggest that development of decay on 10-mm diameter branches is numerically smaller than values on all other size branches tested. This experiment will be conducted again in 1998 to gain additional data.

Different fungicides and wound dressings were tested in 1997 for their potential to suppress development of Coniophora brown wood rot. As illustrated in Table 3, Abound and ETK-1104 were the only tested products that significantly reduced brown wood rot compared to nontreated trees. Considering 1996 and 1997 data, we have identified some potential chemical disease management products, including Nectec P (a combination of propiconazole and imazalil), ETK-1104 (sodium tetrathiocarbonate), and Abound (azoxystrobin). Further evaluation of these materials is planned.

Phytophthora root rot and gummosis

Root rot experiments rate the ability of citrus rootstocks to resist infection by zoospores of Phytophthora citrophthoraor P. parasitica. A summary of root rot evaluation studies, primarily conducted in 1994 and 1995, is presented in Table 4. Each value presented in Table 4 was derived from 10 or 20 individual rootstock plants within 2 or 4 separate experiments, respectively. Among tested rootstocks, Citrus macrophylla appeared to be the most tolerant or resistant to root loss due to P. citrophthora and P. parasitica, demonstrating an average root loss of 33 percent in the presence of both pathogens. Root loss on rough lemon, C. volkameriana and Troyer citrange caused by both pathogens was lower than most tested rootstocks and ranged from 34 to 71 percent. In comparison, root loss on Carrizo citrange, C-35 citrange and sour orange ranged from 76 to 90 percent and was among the higher values of disease recorded in these studies. Some of the potential new rootstocks scored well in these trials; however, none were generally superior to rootstocks now in use such as C. macrophylla, C. volkameriana, rough lemon and Troyer citrange.

The gummosis or stem canker development trials test the relative resistance of stem tissue to growth of both fungal pathogens within bark tissue. A summary of gummosis evaluation studies, primarily conducted in 1993, 1994 and 1996, is presented in Table 5. Each value presented in Table 5 was derived from 10, 20 or 30 individual rootstock plants within 2, 4 or 6 separate experiments, respectively. Troyer citrange, Carrizo citrange, sour orange, Citrus macrophylla and C-35 citrange were among the best performers with respect to suppression of stem canker growth when inoculated with P. citrophthora and P. parasitica, with stem cankers ranging from 2 to 8 mm in length. Rough lemon and C. volkameriana were more susceptible to gummosis, with stem cankers ranging from 8 to 16 mm in length after inoculation with the two species of Phytophthora. A few of the potential new rootstocks inhibited stem canker formation to a greater degree than any of the tested rootstocks currently in use.

Our results demonstrate that classifying citrus rootstocks as susceptible or resistant to Phytophthora cannot be accomplished without defining which Phytophthora disease (root rot or gummosis) and which pathogen (P. citrophthora or P. parasitica) we are referring to. Also, remember that the results presented here were derived from plants ranging in age from 4 to 27 months old. Tree age, scion, nutrition and other factors that affect the overall health of the tree could affect rootstock resistance or susceptibility to Phytophthora. In spite of the shortcomings of using juvenile plants to predict disease resistance of trees that may have an economic life of at least 30 years or more, these tests allow us to compare relative resistance to Phytophthora diseases in a fairly rapid manner.

Acknowledgement

The authors wish to thank the Arizona Citrus Research Council for supporting this project. This is the final report for project 97-02 - Improving management and control of fungal diseases affecting Arizona citrus trees, 1997.


This is a part of publication AZ1051: "1998 Citrus and Deciduous Fruit and Nut Research Report," College of Agriculture, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, 85721.
This document located at http://ag.arizona.edu/pubs/crops/az1051/az10516.html
Return to Table of Contents