|
|
The
University of Arizona Department of Soil, Water, and Environmental Science |
IK
2011 Field Study Installation
Materials and Methods
In April 2011, the area previously prepared to the south-east of the phase I study, was surveyed and prepared for installation of the Phase II study |
The phase II area was ripped in three directions to a depth of 12 in. (38 cm) with a John Deer 210 tractor. The field was then disked in four passes with an agricultural disk to breakup large clods and even out the surface. |
Plot borders were staked out for the Phase II study. Twenty
four plots (25ft x 50ft; 7.6m x 15.2m) were laid out in a randomized complete
block design, with 6 treatments of varying compost and seeding rates [Table
1 and 2], and 4 replications blocked against a previously surveyed pH gradient
[Figure 4] (Hayes etal, 2009). The position of lime treatment plots were
forced to the southern end (down slope) of the study to prevent cross treatment
contamination in case of a runoff event. |
Treatment # |
Treatments (replicated
four times) |
||
% Compost w/w |
Seeding |
lime (lbs/ac) |
|
1 |
15 |
seeded |
0 |
2 |
15 |
seeded * |
0 |
3 |
15 |
seeded |
18000 |
4 |
10 |
seeded |
0 |
5 |
10 |
seeded * |
0 |
6 |
10 |
seeded |
18000 |
* with plant growth promoting bacteria treatments. See PGPB treatment outline, table XX |
Table 2. . Species and Seeding rates for Phase II
Specie | Seeding
Rate |
||
common | scientific | lb/ac |
kg/ha |
Arizona Fescue | Festuca arizonica | 50 |
55 |
Buffalo Grass | Buchloe dactyloides | 80 |
88 |
Quail bush | Atriplex lentiformas | 37 |
41 |
Catclaw Acacia | Acacia greggii | 0.93 |
1.02 |
Mesquite | Prosopis juliflora | 0.13 |
.14 |
Composted dairy manure (Arizona Dairy
Compost, LLC) (Table 3 and 4) was applied to plots according to treatment
designations using a John Deere 210 front end loader. The applied
compost mass was weighed out by the bucket load using truck scales
prior to applying to the plots. The compost was spread on out the
plots with the front end loader, disked into the tailings with an
agricultural disk, and then rototilled with an 80 inch pto-driven
rototiller. Hydrated mortar lime was applied and incorporated with
a disk in the lime treated plots prior to compost application. |
|
Small seed species were hand broadcasted over the plots according to treatment designations. Seed was mixed into the tailings using a 80" spiked toothed harrow and chain link drag. Following seeding straw was scattered over the plot surfaces at a rate of 150 lbs/plot (2 bales). The hay was then crimped 4 inches deep into the tailing surface with a bank of 4 18" agricultural disk blades. Lime, small seed, and hay applications were conducted at night as high winds during the day made these operations difficult. Large seeded species (mesquite and acacia) were sown by hand post hay application. Each specie was planted to two seed lines across the length of the plot, 1.0 inch deep and 12" apart. Seed lines were were spaced 3 foot apart and species were alternated between the seed lines. |
|
Once treatments were completed, plot borders were constructed with an 80" border disk. The finished plot size after completion of the borders was 25ft x 43ft. Soil samples were collected from the top 6 in. of each plot to establish initial chemical parameters. A sprinkler system was installed to provide irrigation and fence was erected around the study area to to inhibit wildlife grazing. Plots were irrigated every 7 to 10 days in the absence of rainfall. Due to limited water availability the amount of water applied was limited to about 25 to 40 % of the estimated ET. A photolog of the field status was recorded with each site visit. |
|
|
For comments and questions regarding site contact: webmanager